Thursday, July 16, 2009
The Need for a Public Option
Saturday, June 20, 2009
Grow a Set
Friday, June 5, 2009
So Who's Going to be Coach When Coach is Dumb
Monday, May 25, 2009
Treating Each Other as Countrymen
Wednesday, May 20, 2009
Idiot of the week of 5/20/09
Saturday, May 16, 2009
IOW for 5/15/09
Saturday, May 9, 2009
5/9/09 A new Idiot
Saturday, May 2, 2009
Idiot of the week
Friday, May 1, 2009
Grading the Republican
We always grade the president after 100 days. On television and in talking head land they have spent a lot of time grading how the president has done during the first hundred days of his presidency. Nobody has talked about grading the Republican Party during this first 100 days of being a minority party. Are they doing what a strong minority should be doing during this time.
Its important that the Republican party be more than the party of “no” They are needed to have a healthy discussion of the issues that are coming up. So how have they fared during this time. The other day when Senator Spector changed parties, Chris Mathews on hardball gave his assessment by saying that they are quickly becoming the party of the South, The Religious and the intolerant.
So here goes…….. For coming up with alternate ideas they get an “F” Mostly because they haven’t come up with any.
Helping to raise the psychology of the country. They get an “F” because they continue to fear monger and look for enemies under any rock they can find
Finding new and interesting leadership into the national conscience, they get an “F” because they continue to defer to the tired and old leadership they have had in the past. They seem to love the old and the dumb leader because that about all they have shown.
Monday, April 27, 2009
No Guns Please
Sunday, April 12, 2009
Guns anybody
On “This Week” George Will made a very typical right wing statement that showed the basic difference between the left and the right. The said there is no community of nations, and that we don’t get along. He said that harmony is not natural and that we could never get along. He said conflict is natural. Its here where the right wing stops they’re thinking. They refuse to go to the next step. It’s the next step that the leader of their religion introduced to the world. Wasn’t it Christ who was called the King of peace? So as far as I can tell one of the major differences between left and right is that the right always think some one is out to get them. The left on the other hand always feel that there is hope that we all can get along. The truth probably lies somewhere between the two extremes.
Well if that’s the case it explains Shawn Hannity, Bill O, Rush, Beck and all the other Right wing nuts that they love listening to and following without stopping to ask them selves why? It also explains why those wing nuts are out buying guns at a record pace. They believe that the Obama administration will put a stop to owning guns even though nobody in the administration has suggested such a move.
The truth is something does need to be done about the availability of guns. The US has more gun deaths than the rest of the world combined and strangely enough we also have the easiest gun ownership in the world. With the recent rash of mass murders by guns it would seem like we have to do something different. We are supposed to be a smart country and I always believe that smart people take responsibility for what they are doing wrong and then do something different to make it better.
We are the most dangerous and violent country in the world. People are shot to death for just riding on the freeways and just sitting in class in school. Our neighbors blame us for their rise in violence they say that the guns being used by the drug cartels are coming directly from the U.S. We have a need to limit the use of guns and the ready access to guns that we have now. That way we can all be a little safer.
Monday, March 30, 2009
Just a Business
Saturday, March 21, 2009
A Letter from my Congressman
live in a Gerrymandered Congressional district. This is a Republican dominated district that has close to 90% registered republicans. In many elections the democrats don’t even bother to run a candidate. Our Representative is Garry Miller. He used to be on my residential city council and found a way to run for congress when our last republican congressman was guilty of accepting illegal campaign contributions leaving this sure republican district open to a new congressman. He’ll probably keep this job no matter what anybody in his district fells or says until 2012 when the district will reapportioned under a new system that’s suppose to end gerrymandering in California. I hope it works.
I tell you this information so that you can understand my frustrations over voicing my opinion to my congressman. It true I can voice it, but he will never take me serious because he only has to satisfy of part of the constituency. I wrote him and email asking for some cooperation when it came to the budget and the recovery act. And that he actually consider the bill before voting against them and not just vote as a republican but as a representative of our district.
I received an answer that was as frustrating as any answer I had ever read. It made me wonder as to the intelligence of this district I live in when this congressman can send me a letter so insulting of my intelligence and think its acceptable. He told me he voted against the 700-dollar plus bill because of three provisions that constituted less than 2% of the whole bill. The issues he chose to tell me about were probably among the most innocuous of all the provision in the bill. He didn’t like that one billion dollars were going to be dedicated to Wellness and disease prevention. He also wanted found that $335 million to help prevent sexually transmitted diseases and sexual education wanting even though we have a higher teen pregnancy rate than India. He also objected to $50 billion on art. He complains that these spending plans wouldn’t create one job. I don’t know but I think people have to be hired to deliver all these services. Lastly he told me that he supported his party’s stimulus package but he never told me of one provision in that bill and when I researched this bill I couldn’t find it.
We have to do something to get rid of these kinds of representatives. Gerrymandering is the most anti democratic institution in our country. Please hurry 20012.
Monday, March 16, 2009
Living in the Bubble
We all live in a bubble and the recent plunge of the stock market is proof. At over 1400 the DOW was really over evaluated. It was in the same state as the housing market and the Dot.coms of the nineties. Do you remember the savings and loan bubble that burst during Reagan’s administration? They were the first to feel the pinch of a poorly thought out tax plan. We have had a tax plan that has slowly choked the middle class for the benefit of the upper class.
We also live in a bubble of misinformation and diversion. Often our politicians give us diversions so that we don’t notice how they are fixing things up for the over-class. Recently the politicians were grinding on about earmarks. To hear them talk you would think that if we got rid of these earmarks we would solve the fiscal problem that our federal government faces. Once you add up all the earmarks in the recent budget you find that it was only 1% of the total budget. So instead of figuring out were the real waste was in the budget, we spent all that time talking about the minutia of earmarks.
Sunday, March 1, 2009
To Say or not to Say that is the Question
Words, words, words, that’s what this blog is about. I’ve started this blog entry many times because I find it very hard to write about the subject I present in this entry until I realized that the subject was words. Words bring a simple question to mind. Why aren’t the words of the president enough to get the congress to work together and come up with reasonable solutions to the countries economic, health, and educational problems? Why can’t the members of our congress meet and confer and produce reasonable legislation to get our country moving toward solvency again?
When you hear the words that are used by both the left and the right to communicate it becomes clear that the present political coterie can never solve a problem. Each group exaggerates the position of its opposing cabal and belittles them for that position. A good example of this is what Bobby Jendal is saying about a planned high-speed train that runs from Los Angeles to Los Vegas. He has said that it’s a train from Disneyland to Los Vegas. The fact that he inserted Disneyland as a starting point gave him fodder to ridicule the Recovery Bill. Ronald Reagan was particularly good at this. He made being a Liberal a dirty word when he called Mondale the “L” word. Since that time conservatives have used the word Liberal to discount anything people who take an opposing view of any issue. I could find so many more examples of this kind of talk by conservatives, but this doesn’t expunge liberals from blame. They might have even started all this nefarious language in the sixties. It was the “peace movement” that called the conservative establishment a demonic group of people. During the Bush administration I heard certain left wing broadcasters call President Bush head of a crime family. They called Cheney Darth Vader who everybody knows is the embodiment of evil.
As long as the fringe on both sides of the isle are allowed to be the spokes people and our political leaders defer to these people as the prime movers of their political philosophy our problems will not be solved. All of us need to tone down the rhetoric and open our ears and show respect to those whose ideas are different than our own. Not only will we have a better chance to solve these problems but also each of us might learn something to make our personal lives better.
Saturday, February 14, 2009
The Peoples Work
Tuesday, February 10, 2009
No Brains
Saturday, January 24, 2009
Try and Remember the Past this Time
We have a new president. Most of us look forward to the new person it marks the beginning of a new era in our country. Maybe it will mark a kinder gentler era. We certainly need that. It’s an cinch that Obama is trying to usher in a kinder gentler era. He started out forgiving a fellow Democrat (Lieberman) for backing his opponent in the election and he invited a preacher whose views are certain opposed too much of what he believes.
These signals haven’t been enough to stop those who ply the party out of power. They are continuing their vitriol through their stealth emailing. But worse than that they are starting to revise history. You can hear it on the Sunday talking heads programs as they start talking about the Bush legacy as they crow about the legacy of the last eight years.
First they talk about “No child left behind” as a successful program. You can asked almost any teacher and find the fallacy in that statement. Not only have the schools not improved during the Bush years, they’ve become decidedly worse.
Two, you keep hearing how we haven’t been attacked since 9/11. To believe that you would have to discount almost very other attack since then, plus discount the over 4000 people we’ve lost in Iraq. These people conveniently ignore the attacks against those who support us such as Spain, England, and India. They don’t count the less spectacular attacks that are meant to soften us up. They don’t count the years that we have been caused to live in fear of being randomly attacked. THEY ALSO DON’T COUNT THE ATTACKS AGAINST OUR CONSTITUTION.
Three, I’ve heard talk about keeping taxes low and growing the job market. Truth about this has been the opposite. The job market has shrunk and jobs have paid less and less money during the Bush years. Today most people have to have at least two jobs to supply their households with the goods and services. We are receiving less pay and fewer benefits.
Lastly, I would like to remind you that we’ve now had two Bushes and each has left office in disrepute and very low approval ratings. Each has left office with an economy that’s in trouble. Each has left office with a list of failures that make for a long list. With the first Bush history was rewritten and his time in office remade into a successful period. We shouldn’t allow this to happen with this Bush. And people ………. Lets never allow a third Bush into the office of president.
Thursday, January 8, 2009
Change?
This month in this country we are going to witness a great momentous occasion. As a country we will swear in a man of a different ethnic origins than the tradition president has been. This will be the culmination of a struggle to change people’s ideas of what constitutes an American that has taken almost fifty years. Through out human existence two things have always been a constant. One is that human thought will mature and change. Two, is that many humans and many institutions will arise to resist that change and therefore slowing the new thoughts acceptance in society as a whole. Indeed even as Thomas Jefferson wrote the Declaration of Independence, it is difficult it is for people to change and people are resistant to change.
Among the leading institutions that are resistant to change are the religious institutions that permeate all societies. These institutions are so completely resistant to change that often they maintain their dogma until this dogma causes the institution itself to wither and die. Often the older religious institutions don’t completely die off they just wane until they are unique pictures of past thought.
A second resistant institution of change is government itself. While the halls of government are many times populated brilliant forward thinking people, the engine of government is filled with narrow thinking bureaucrats whose main purpose in life is to ensure there personal place. To attain this they make sure that all change is resisted and discarded. The older the government is, the larger and more entrenched the bureaucracy becomes until that government stagnates.
I was a teacher for 35 years and I was proud to be on the first staff of the new school I opened. We were a shining light and people came from all over this country to see how we presented our curriculum. Young and competent teacher would apply to be on the faculty of this school and parents would line up early to make sure their child became students at our school.
I taught special education at this school for the first seven years. By the end of the seventh year I burned out as a special education teacher and took advantage of an opening that occurred that year. When the school was eight years old, I started teaching language and history. By that time the culture was set and I was seen as an outsider (special education teacher are mostly seen that way). The real problem was that this established bureaucracy in the school had taken hold and innovation of any kind became discouraged. The same people remain in charge for the next twenty years. Consequently, the wonderful start the school had atrophied and slowly but at a quickening pace the student population of the school began the shrink. As principals changed, they would sometime try and change the schools culture but was largely unsuccessful even when they knew that the people in leadership positions were the ones causing this stagnation
What does this have to do with Obama being inaugurated the 20th of this month? Well he promised us change. He will have to fight a more established bureaucracy than the one I just talked about in my old school. We people should be holding his feet to the fire about this change. We can see already that his appointments are mostly rethreaded Clinton people. This doesn’t seem much like change to me. He’s already modified some of his campaign promises. We all know that compromise is what makes government function. It doesn’t take much of a genius to see that he’s choosing function at the expense of innovation and tradition over redesign.