Papa's Blog

The Need for a Public Option

2009-07-16T23:51:00.000-07:00

We elected the Democrats to solve several problems. Until the stock market tanked the most important was health care. Without a public option we won't have medical reform. This is a call to the Democrats. Grow a pair!!!!!!!!!! and stand up for what you stand for. Nuff said

Grow a Set

2009-06-20T11:39:00.000-07:00

So Bush (I won't call him president because he wasn't really presidential) is now speaking against President Obama. The Democrats are backing away from a public option when it comes health care because can't get republicans to buy into a public option. The Democratic appointed head of the CIA has backed away from criticism of Cheney. Obama has backed away from getting out of the wars and lastly they are giving into the republicans on several other issues.

I voted for the current set of rulers because I felt we needed to change the direction of the country. If I had known that the Democrats had no balls I may have had second thoughts. I would like to see these gutless wonders stand up for what they supposedly say they do believe in and tell the minority party that either they can go along and contribute to current legislation or shut up and just gripe. Although I consider myself liberal unless the Dems start standing up for their principles I will vote for the other side in the next election.

So Who's Going to be Coach When Coach is Dumb

2009-06-05T12:29:00.000-07:00

So this week Craig T Nelson who played coach on television went on Glen Beck and tried to complain about the Bailouts of the Auto Company's. His dumb statement was played on many talking head shows. He said nobody ever gave him a bail out and he was on welfare and food stamps. The Dumbo doesn't even know that welfare and Food stamps is a bail out for normal people. For your stupidity on the Glen Beck show and for Glen Beck allowing you to make this statement with out challenge I crown you both idiots of the week

Treating Each Other as Countrymen

2009-05-25T21:01:00.000-07:00

Well today's subject came to my conscience as I was listening to several people not only on television but also on the radio. It seems that in this country people really don't have a feel that we are all in one family. We treat each other like strangers and we are out to get one another. even those people that call themselves patriots and good Americans don't treat their fellow Americans as country men.

You hear it all the time. This person is going to get that person. Madeoff steals Billions from people whom he should count as brothers. The executives of Enron set up a whole plan to steal the hard earned money by falsely creating energy shortages. Mass shootings have taken place in our collages and high schools. Poor people are killing each other for almost no reason at all when they should be helping each other out of their situation.

The strange thing is that many of the most egregious act are perpetuated by those who call themselves Christians. I have no idea why we don't have sympathy for those of us other people who call ourselves Americans, but it has become a large flaw in our countries psychology. Someplace we have start acting like we're in this country together and that we all have a steak in seeing to our mutual well being. When we start doing this perhaps our country will again become the attractive flame to the world it once was.

Idiot of the week of 5/20/09

2009-05-20T21:16:00.000-07:00

Today's idiot is the 21% of the people that still call themselves republicans. There leaders today wasted their time by meeting and deciding that they should rename the Democratic Party. I don't understand why they think that calling names is the way to grow their party. Truth is they have offered no alternatives and they think that people are so stupid that this diversion will attract anybody. Its sort of like when they offered an alternate budget without any numbers. So if you are still a republican please change your leaders and get them to take their politics seriously. We really need a second party that's a loyal opposition (just to let you know I'm neither a Republican or a Democrat)

IOW for 5/15/09

2009-05-16T00:51:00.000-07:00

This weeks IOW is Nancy Polosi. All she really had to do was tell the truth about her knowledge of water boarding. Everybody already knows that she knew all about it. She could have simply said it was information that was classified and she couldn't discus it. Instead she decided to parse words and change stories several times. All this was going on while the president was trying to get legislation to protect people from the predatory practices of credit card companies. The country should have been paying attention to this instead of hearing her tortured explanations

5/9/09 A new Idiot

2009-05-09T00:34:00.000-07:00

This weeks Idiot is pretty obvious. Its the newest Democrat in the Senate. Yes its Arlen Spector. First he changes parties because he says he can't be elected as a Republican. Second he then goes on all the talking heads and says he is not going to be a loyal Democrat. Then He claims that he'll retain all his seniority. Then to insure that he gets none he says he would like Norm Colemen a Republican to be seated in Minnesota over the Democrat Al Franken. ......... Congratulations you idiot.

Idiot of the week

2009-05-02T15:24:00.000-07:00

I watch a lot of political shows. I actually enjoy listening to them. From time to time these shows broad caste a story that deserves special mention. I will strive to remember where this article came from so that you might know the source. The articles that catch my attention are ones that are so silly you'd have to be an idiot to believe them or that the person that is the main subject of the article had to be an idiot to say or do what he or she did. The first week I have three outstanding idiots

In third place is the federal and state and local governments that called the current swine flu a real threat ..... This came from all the news on television that devoted most of the week trying to panic the public about this story. By the end of the week scientist were reporting that this flu was not very virulent and that it wasn't as bad as any normal winter flu outbreak

Michele Bachmann is in second place for an article from the Huffingtonpost. Miss Bachmann linked the swine flu to the Democrat party and used the last outbreak as proof. Not only does this linking show she's an idiot, but she got the history wrong. The last outbreak of swine flu was during the Ford administration.

The winner of the week comes from "Real Time" It concerns Governor Rick Perry. After he appointed a creationist as the head of the Texas board of education showing that he doesn't believe in evolution and suggesting that the State might succeed from the union. He now wants the federal government to give a large share of the Flu vaccine to help him fight this new strain of flu that has evolved. Governor Perry ...... You get the Idiot of the week award

Grading the Republican

2009-05-01T22:07:00.000-07:00

We always grade the president after 100 days. On television and in talking head land they have spent a lot of time grading how the president has done during the first hundred days of his presidency. Nobody has talked about grading the Republican Party during this first 100 days of being a minority party. Are they doing what a strong minority should be doing during this time.

Its important that the Republican party be more than the party of “no” They are needed to have a healthy discussion of the issues that are coming up. So how have they fared during this time. The other day when Senator Spector changed parties, Chris Mathews on hardball gave his assessment by saying that they are quickly becoming the party of the South, The Religious and the intolerant.

So here goes…….. For coming up with alternate ideas they get an “F” Mostly because they haven’t come up with any.

Helping to raise the psychology of the country. They get an “F” because they continue to fear monger and look for enemies under any rock they can find

Finding new and interesting leadership into the national conscience, they get an “F” because they continue to defer to the tired and old leadership they have had in the past. They seem to love the old and the dumb leader because that about all they have shown.

All and All the republican party gets an “F” as the minority party and it’s the main reason that they have sunk into a regional party with a narrow focus.

No Guns Please

2009-04-27T17:18:00.000-07:00

The other day I was watching the local news on television. The first five articles were about shootings. They were shootings of young people: Shootings of old people: Multiple shootings: School shootings and other articles where guns were used aggressively. All the while I'm sitting on my family room couch wondering why we can't do anything about it.

Wayne LaPierre on the NRA's web site is warning that its just a matter of time before guns are outlawed by the Obama administration even though they have never mentioned anything about doing so. At gun stores the news tells us that the pin heads that own guns are buying ammo at a record pace because they are afraid that guns or ammo will be banned. Again Wayne LaPierre is arguing that there should be no laws limiting or banning any kind of gun or rifle. While he's making this argument our American citizens are being shot at a record pace. We are losing more young people to gun violence on out own shores that were are in Iraq or Afghanistan.

People what we're doing about this kind of crime is not working. I consider myself intelligent and as an intelligent person I know that if something doesn't work you should do something different. Why don't we put a real limit on the ownership of guns so that maybe the streets will be a little safer than they are now.

Guns anybody

2009-04-12T22:10:00.000-07:00

On “This Week” George Will made a very typical right wing statement that showed the basic difference between the left and the right. The said there is no community of nations, and that we don’t get along. He said that harmony is not natural and that we could never get along. He said conflict is natural. Its here where the right wing stops they’re thinking. They refuse to go to the next step. It’s the next step that the leader of their religion introduced to the world. Wasn’t it Christ who was called the King of peace? So as far as I can tell one of the major differences between left and right is that the right always think some one is out to get them. The left on the other hand always feel that there is hope that we all can get along. The truth probably lies somewhere between the two extremes.

Well if that’s the case it explains Shawn Hannity, Bill O, Rush, Beck and all the other Right wing nuts that they love listening to and following without stopping to ask them selves why? It also explains why those wing nuts are out buying guns at a record pace. They believe that the Obama administration will put a stop to owning guns even though nobody in the administration has suggested such a move.

The truth is something does need to be done about the availability of guns. The US has more gun deaths than the rest of the world combined and strangely enough we also have the easiest gun ownership in the world. With the recent rash of mass murders by guns it would seem like we have to do something different. We are supposed to be a smart country and I always believe that smart people take responsibility for what they are doing wrong and then do something different to make it better.

We are the most dangerous and violent country in the world. People are shot to death for just riding on the freeways and just sitting in class in school. Our neighbors blame us for their rise in violence they say that the guns being used by the drug cartels are coming directly from the U.S. We have a need to limit the use of guns and the ready access to guns that we have now. That way we can all be a little safer.

Just a Business

2009-03-30T14:42:00.000-07:00

The other day I took my grandchild on a school field trip. Now my grandchild attends a middle school that is located in a lower middle class neighborhood. Its a good school and the children that attend the school are nice children. They have all the normal problems any school has in this day and age. This particular field trip involved the students working on a community project. In this case they had volunteered to stuff envelops for the community orchestra. I sat down at a table near where the children were doing the stuffing and started listening to their conversation.

I found it interesting, but soon the boys turned toward sports. The conversation centered around the current basketball season. They argued over who was the better player. Bryant or James. What team would make the playoffs and what was the best team in the NBA.

Soon I began to realize that these children really were arguing over only the professional teams. There wasn't one word said about the collages or any other level of sports. I turned toward them and asked what collage team they were for in the NCAA's tournament. They really had no answer for me. Then I asked them what was their favorite collage team. They couldn't really name one. Out of frustration I told them that what they were admiring was no more than a business and that the Lakers and Kobe Bryant had no thoughts of them except how much can you spend on their merchandise and clothing. That if they could make more money by moving to another city they would and that the players care less about the people who are fans. They move from city to city to make as much money they can make. Labron James just said he wants to have the first billion dollar business of any sportsman. The truth is The Lakers, the Cavileers, the Celtics, are in sports they are nothing more than businesses.

A Letter from my Congressman

2009-03-21T20:52:00.000-07:00

live in a Gerrymandered Congressional district. This is a Republican dominated district that has close to 90% registered republicans. In many elections the democrats don’t even bother to run a candidate. Our Representative is Garry Miller. He used to be on my residential city council and found a way to run for congress when our last republican congressman was guilty of accepting illegal campaign contributions leaving this sure republican district open to a new congressman. He’ll probably keep this job no matter what anybody in his district fells or says until 2012 when the district will reapportioned under a new system that’s suppose to end gerrymandering in California. I hope it works.

I tell you this information so that you can understand my frustrations over voicing my opinion to my congressman. It true I can voice it, but he will never take me serious because he only has to satisfy of part of the constituency. I wrote him and email asking for some cooperation when it came to the budget and the recovery act. And that he actually consider the bill before voting against them and not just vote as a republican but as a representative of our district.

I received an answer that was as frustrating as any answer I had ever read. It made me wonder as to the intelligence of this district I live in when this congressman can send me a letter so insulting of my intelligence and think its acceptable. He told me he voted against the 700-dollar plus bill because of three provisions that constituted less than 2% of the whole bill. The issues he chose to tell me about were probably among the most innocuous of all the provision in the bill. He didn’t like that one billion dollars were going to be dedicated to Wellness and disease prevention. He also wanted found that $335 million to help prevent sexually transmitted diseases and sexual education wanting even though we have a higher teen pregnancy rate than India. He also objected to $50 billion on art. He complains that these spending plans wouldn’t create one job. I don’t know but I think people have to be hired to deliver all these services. Lastly he told me that he supported his party’s stimulus package but he never told me of one provision in that bill and when I researched this bill I couldn’t find it.

We have to do something to get rid of these kinds of representatives. Gerrymandering is the most anti democratic institution in our country. Please hurry 20012.

Living in the Bubble

2009-03-16T17:17:00.000-07:00

We all live in a bubble and the recent plunge of the stock market is proof. At over 1400 the DOW was really over evaluated. It was in the same state as the housing market and the Dot.coms of the nineties. Do you remember the savings and loan bubble that burst during Reagan’s administration? They were the first to feel the pinch of a poorly thought out tax plan. We have had a tax plan that has slowly choked the middle class for the benefit of the upper class.

We also live in a bubble of misinformation and diversion. Often our politicians give us diversions so that we don’t notice how they are fixing things up for the over-class. Recently the politicians were grinding on about earmarks. To hear them talk you would think that if we got rid of these earmarks we would solve the fiscal problem that our federal government faces. Once you add up all the earmarks in the recent budget you find that it was only 1% of the total budget. So instead of figuring out were the real waste was in the budget, we spent all that time talking about the minutia of earmarks.

Our politicians do this with other responsibilities they have. They yell about welfare fraud from people who take hundreds out of our economy, but ignore the Enron’s who take Billions, but every once in a while they get caught and we can see what they’re really doing. Today AIG gave they’re top management bonuses while they were taking billions from our pockets. It was such an egregious move that there was no cover up for their greed. So, we heard about it and everybody has shown the proper amount of anger. You hear all the talking heads telling you about how terrible AIG is. Soon you can expect some trivial incident to be talked about to divert our attention, but you will not see our tax system fixed.

To Say or not to Say that is the Question

2009-03-01T23:09:00.000-08:00

Words, words, words, that’s what this blog is about. I’ve started this blog entry many times because I find it very hard to write about the subject I present in this entry until I realized that the subject was words. Words bring a simple question to mind. Why aren’t the words of the president enough to get the congress to work together and come up with reasonable solutions to the countries economic, health, and educational problems? Why can’t the members of our congress meet and confer and produce reasonable legislation to get our country moving toward solvency again?

When you hear the words that are used by both the left and the right to communicate it becomes clear that the present political coterie can never solve a problem. Each group exaggerates the position of its opposing cabal and belittles them for that position. A good example of this is what Bobby Jendal is saying about a planned high-speed train that runs from Los Angeles to Los Vegas. He has said that it’s a train from Disneyland to Los Vegas. The fact that he inserted Disneyland as a starting point gave him fodder to ridicule the Recovery Bill. Ronald Reagan was particularly good at this. He made being a Liberal a dirty word when he called Mondale the “L” word. Since that time conservatives have used the word Liberal to discount anything people who take an opposing view of any issue. I could find so many more examples of this kind of talk by conservatives, but this doesn’t expunge liberals from blame. They might have even started all this nefarious language in the sixties. It was the “peace movement” that called the conservative establishment a demonic group of people. During the Bush administration I heard certain left wing broadcasters call President Bush head of a crime family. They called Cheney Darth Vader who everybody knows is the embodiment of evil.

As long as the fringe on both sides of the isle are allowed to be the spokes people and our political leaders defer to these people as the prime movers of their political philosophy our problems will not be solved. All of us need to tone down the rhetoric and open our ears and show respect to those whose ideas are different than our own. Not only will we have a better chance to solve these problems but also each of us might learn something to make our personal lives better.

The Peoples Work

2009-02-14T11:07:00.000-08:00

So the other day John Boehner stood before the cameras and had the nerve to decry the spending habits of the new Democratic congress. Michael Steele the new chair of the Republican Party sat in front of a TV commentator and said the stimulus bill doesn't create jobs it only creates work and then he gave a tortured explanation of the difference between work and a job. Even over the objection of the commentator he rationalized his explanation. It seems to me that these men really haven't understood the meaning of the last election. After residing over the greatest give-a-way in our countries history these people stand up and say that they are fiscal conservatives and look to keep spending under control.

The truth is that these old Republicans are ecclesial partisans that put their party ahead of the country. Most of them have "safe seats" so the peoples business comes secondary to self-enrichment. They often look to enhance a narrow group of friends or a small group of supporters. They have no respect for the truth or even the welfare of the general population of their constituency because they know that their districts are constituted that they have a safe seat and will elected no matter what.

As of now they constitute a small minority of congress and are becoming less and less of the Senate. The real problem is that the same minority resides on the left side of the isle of congress. Those on the left that reside in safe seats do the same as those on the right. When they are in the minority they give the same tortured explanation and definitions as the right does. The real problem with all of this is gerrymandering of the districts. I live in district That's so gerrymandered that part of it is separated to allow a safe seat.

The most important cure that would facilitate our representatives working on the peoples business rather than partisan business would be to pass a constitutional amendment that would demand that all congressional districts be competitive. That at anytime if the representative doesn't do the peoples work they can be voted out. Then the people could really have a vote them out policy. The representative would have to take their responsibility to their district seriously.

No Brains

2009-02-10T12:48:00.000-08:00

So "The House" voted on the stimulus bill. Not one Republican voted for it. They all followed the party line. In the Senate their version of the stimulus bill attracted three Republicans. This shows either two things. One, that these silly people are not smart enough to decide the merits of bill without being told how to think about it. Or Two, that the Republican Party and its representatives puts the party ahead of the country. Personally I believe that the people that represent the Republican party are both of these. They are dumb and worried more about their party than they are about the country.

It's really time to stop being a Republican or a Democrat and start being an American. We don't really care about political parties anymore because we know that they are all bought and paid for by interest groups. I find that most of the people that get into the positions of representative or senator or any other high political position are very remote from the population as whole. To combat this I've developed a system of voting that over a period of time should get the politicians closer to the people. It really a simple scheme. If they are in I vote them out regardless of party affiliation. So remember vote them out.

Try and Remember the Past this Time

2009-01-24T15:09:00.000-08:00

We have a new president. Most of us look forward to the new person it marks the beginning of a new era in our country. Maybe it will mark a kinder gentler era. We certainly need that. It’s an cinch that Obama is trying to usher in a kinder gentler era. He started out forgiving a fellow Democrat (Lieberman) for backing his opponent in the election and he invited a preacher whose views are certain opposed too much of what he believes.

These signals haven’t been enough to stop those who ply the party out of power. They are continuing their vitriol through their stealth emailing. But worse than that they are starting to revise history. You can hear it on the Sunday talking heads programs as they start talking about the Bush legacy as they crow about the legacy of the last eight years.

First they talk about “No child left behind” as a successful program. You can asked almost any teacher and find the fallacy in that statement. Not only have the schools not improved during the Bush years, they’ve become decidedly worse.

Two, you keep hearing how we haven’t been attacked since 9/11. To believe that you would have to discount almost very other attack since then, plus discount the over 4000 people we’ve lost in Iraq. These people conveniently ignore the attacks against those who support us such as Spain, England, and India. They don’t count the less spectacular attacks that are meant to soften us up. They don’t count the years that we have been caused to live in fear of being randomly attacked. THEY ALSO DON’T COUNT THE ATTACKS AGAINST OUR CONSTITUTION.

Three, I’ve heard talk about keeping taxes low and growing the job market. Truth about this has been the opposite. The job market has shrunk and jobs have paid less and less money during the Bush years. Today most people have to have at least two jobs to supply their households with the goods and services. We are receiving less pay and fewer benefits.

Lastly, I would like to remind you that we’ve now had two Bushes and each has left office in disrepute and very low approval ratings. Each has left office with an economy that’s in trouble. Each has left office with a list of failures that make for a long list. With the first Bush history was rewritten and his time in office remade into a successful period. We shouldn’t allow this to happen with this Bush. And people ………. Lets never allow a third Bush into the office of president.

Change?

2009-01-08T22:20:00.000-08:00

This month in this country we are going to witness a great momentous occasion. As a country we will swear in a man of a different ethnic origins than the tradition president has been. This will be the culmination of a struggle to change people’s ideas of what constitutes an American that has taken almost fifty years. Through out human existence two things have always been a constant. One is that human thought will mature and change. Two, is that many humans and many institutions will arise to resist that change and therefore slowing the new thoughts acceptance in society as a whole. Indeed even as Thomas Jefferson wrote the Declaration of Independence, it is difficult it is for people to change and people are resistant to change.

Among the leading institutions that are resistant to change are the religious institutions that permeate all societies. These institutions are so completely resistant to change that often they maintain their dogma until this dogma causes the institution itself to wither and die. Often the older religious institutions don’t completely die off they just wane until they are unique pictures of past thought.

A second resistant institution of change is government itself. While the halls of government are many times populated brilliant forward thinking people, the engine of government is filled with narrow thinking bureaucrats whose main purpose in life is to ensure there personal place. To attain this they make sure that all change is resisted and discarded. The older the government is, the larger and more entrenched the bureaucracy becomes until that government stagnates.

I was a teacher for 35 years and I was proud to be on the first staff of the new school I opened. We were a shining light and people came from all over this country to see how we presented our curriculum. Young and competent teacher would apply to be on the faculty of this school and parents would line up early to make sure their child became students at our school.

I taught special education at this school for the first seven years. By the end of the seventh year I burned out as a special education teacher and took advantage of an opening that occurred that year. When the school was eight years old, I started teaching language and history. By that time the culture was set and I was seen as an outsider (special education teacher are mostly seen that way). The real problem was that this established bureaucracy in the school had taken hold and innovation of any kind became discouraged. The same people remain in charge for the next twenty years. Consequently, the wonderful start the school had atrophied and slowly but at a quickening pace the student population of the school began the shrink. As principals changed, they would sometime try and change the schools culture but was largely unsuccessful even when they knew that the people in leadership positions were the ones causing this stagnation

What does this have to do with Obama being inaugurated the 20^th of this month? Well he promised us change. He will have to fight a more established bureaucracy than the one I just talked about in my old school. We people should be holding his feet to the fire about this change. We can see already that his appointments are mostly rethreaded Clinton people. This doesn’t seem much like change to me. He’s already modified some of his campaign promises. We all know that compromise is what makes government function. It doesn’t take much of a genius to see that he’s choosing function at the expense of innovation and tradition over redesign.

I hope that Obama is successful and that we as country are able to see our way out of this mess we’re currently embroiled. Perhaps his choices are meant to bring back competence in government. It a sure thing that after these last eight years we badly are in need of a competent government. Then I hope that he will start working on the reforms he promised us. For what its worth I’m keeping my eye peeled.

working People

2008-12-31T00:16:00.000-08:00

One thing has become clear as we end this year. In this country producing something through hard work is no longer valued. Congress has made that very clear through the distribution of the billions of bail out dollars they have appropriated during this economic crises. The banks and insurance company's have asked for help and they got 700 billion with out much debate. However when the auto industry asked for a measly 13 billion they were put through many hoops and in the end turned down. This sent a very clear signal to most of the working people of this country. If you work and actually produce something that's tangible you will not be protected or valued by the people who are responsible for the running of this country.

We have lost our manufacturing base in this country and we could be in trouble if we're forced to go to war with one of the countries that are responsible for providing most of the manufactured items we need to conduct operations of our defense. We have no steel industry in this country and the electronics device manufacturing is largely done by foreign powers. What our legislators should be doing is protecting our meager manufacturing base. Our workers should not have to be paid the small wages that other county's offer their workers. Instead we should protect our higher paid workers and build the middle class. This country has stayed free because of the large middle class and as the "rich" of this country attack the middle class so do they attack our freedoms.

Fairness Doctrine

2008-12-20T14:04:00.000-08:00

The other day I received an email from a conservative friend. In this email the subject of the fairness doctrine was discussed. The email called the possibility of a return to that doctrine instituting censorship. This email startled me because I couldn't understand how fairness translated to censorship in the minds of my friends that are conservative. After all if your airing all sides of an issue aren't you allowing all opinions to be heard and not censoring anything. When you only allow one side of an issue and do not allow diverse opinions isn't that censorship? Lastly, on most talk stations isn't that what we have today?

The radio and television airwaves are limited resources that are in the hands of a few corporations. Unlike the printed media that is unlimited in scope and can have an infinite number of outlets. The airwaves are finite. Further the airwaves belong to all the people and the government leases these airwaves and has an obligation to make sure they are of benefit to all the people. The Fairness Doctrine was established by the FCC in 1949 to insure that the fair use of the airwaves were followed.

The Fairness doctrine was in play until 1987 when the then commissioner Dennis R Patrick ended the regulation. Patrick was a Ronald Reagan lawyer and was newly appointed as FCC commissioner. Since that time more and more time has been devoted to the right wing of society on radio and television following the dictates of the conservative captains of that industry. Today you couldn't find a country run by a dictator that has a more one sided discussion of issues than the United States.

Personally, I don't understand why the right is so exercised by the re-institution of the fairness doctrine. If your ideas are valid, a free discussion can only enhance the righteousness of your issues. I know personally I have modified my views over the years by hearing what people who have different opinions than mine have to say. In a democracy, the people can only make wise decisions by listening to open discussion of the issues that confront them

To see a fuller discussion of this issue you might follow this link http://www.commondreams.org/views05/0212-03.htm

A Thought about how lower Taxes ruined our economy

2008-12-17T11:29:00.000-08:00

So the conventional wisdom about taxes all these year has been lower taxes are better. We've been living with this assumption since Reagan has been president. President Reagan followed the advice of Arthur Laugher and his supply side economics. But since that time we've experienced two phenomenas.

First is that the middle class seems to be shrinking during this period of time. That also includes a decrease in jobs available to the middle class and a devaluing of the work that the middle class does. While the middle class is shrinking the upper class is not expanding they are simply increasing the gap between them and the classes below them. Our wealth as a country is gathering into fewer and fewer hands. This can be clearly demonstrated by the increase of the compensation of executive salaries while the workers at the middle and bottom of the cooperate salary structure have lost benefits and pay.

Second, since the upper levels of society has received tax breaks we've experience several periods of boom, bubble and Bust. These periods have resulted in recessions and depressions. We've had the dot com bust, Saving and loan bust, Banking failures and stock market crashes. All of this has lead to an uncertain future for the people of the United States. Today for the first time in our history people feel the their futures aren't as bright as their parents felt their future were.

So WHAT TO DO ABOUT THIS? It seems reasonable to revert back to a time when the upper class had less available money if they chose not to put their money into actual productive use. Raise the tax levels and give incentives to pay less taxes if they invest it in companies that actually provide jobs and value to our economy. This might result in a lesser growth rate, but it will also result in a steadier growth rate and allow all the classes to have a steak in our Countries future.

The Wrong Way

2008-12-16T21:34:00.000-08:00

So last week the auto bailout failed because of a few Southern Republicans. Strange as it seems, these silly people would rather give 700 billion dollars to groups that really produce nothing than give a few billion to companies that actually produce something. We've lost our steel industry, clothing industry, and most of out consumer appliance industry. the list if manufacturing industries left in the US continues to dwindle. There are very few manufacturing industry's left in our country.

So what's wrong with this? Our congress and presidents have allowed us to be vulnerable to the whims of foreign governments that have an agenda of protecting their own industries at the expense of ours through the ruse of free trade. While we allow these foreign countries to export goods to the US without any strings attached these countries (such as China, Japan,) put restrictions on our exports.

We need to protect our industries and the workers in those industries. We need to equalize labor coast by adding tariffs to the imports. If we allow all of these industries to disappear when time of war or pestilence come we'll have no manufacturing base to build to protect us. What does it matter if we have to pay another $2,000 for a Mazda, or Toyota. WE NEED TO PROTECT U.S. WORKERS. We need to make sure our workers have jobs. We need to make sure we have a strong manufacturing base for the good of our country.

Post election thoughts

2008-12-03T11:03:00.000-08:00

So since the election certain things have become clear.

1) Energy prices have declined at an unprecedented sped. Its my guess that since the next two leaders are no oil people the oil companies don't feel they can do what ever they want as far as pricing goes. Shortly after Bush and Cheney became the leaders of the country gas prices went over $2:00 and have not looked back until now. Perhaps we should try and find out how much was in it for the people in charge. we should know that this was one sign of the looting of America.

2) The war missions are becoming clearer. The Iraqi government has asked us to leave and we should. It would seem just irresponsible to continue to spend 12 billion dollars a month when that money is desperately needed at home.

3) The kind of candidate that really turns on Republicans are rather happy dumb people. While McCain is a nice guy ...... he definitely isn't the smartest light bulb in the tree. And Palin is just Dumb, Dumb, Dumb. And she is a super star of the republican party.

Real Americans

2008-10-21T22:32:00.000-07:00

So in desperation the Republican Party is now trying to instill fear into the population. They're sending out Robo-Calls calling Obama a Terrorist and using his middle name as a means of saying that this man is really not an American. Many of the McCain surrogates are saying those that have a different ideas or religions are not "real Americans." There is one Minnesota Congresswoman who is calling for an investigation of all of the Democrats to see which ones are contrary to and a threat to the real Americans. Sara Palin is calling only small town people and certain parts of the country the Real Americans. This is just one step ahead of saying only certain people are eligible to be counted as real Americans.

John McCain you are supposed to be an American Hero. How could you let your campaign become so low and reprehensible? You are ruining any legacy you have left. My suggestion is to stop it now before you have no honor left. Real Americans aren't decided by place or religion or class of Birth. Real Americans aren't decided by ones right or left political views. Real Americans are decided by how willing we are to tolerate those who are different than us and how willing we are to compromise our ideas so that we all might be able to live together in peace.

Leadership

2008-08-25T00:32:00.000-07:00

Often I've tried to figure out what makes a leader. I know one when I see one. I know when somebody in a leadership role isn't really a leader. That not only goes for politics, but also sports, work (whatever it is), church, and almost any other endeavor humans engage in. How to define what leadership is in a precise way always alluded me.

Well, then I got sick and had a major operation. As I was trying to recover from this trauma I started looking for literature that would inspire me. I came across a Book called The Last Lecture by Randy Pausch. The author talks about a whole host of subjects concerning life in general and the little book is very inspiring. Right there on page 44 was the complete answer to my question about what makes up a good leader. He was writing about Captain Kirk.

........was the distilled essence of the dynamic manager, a guy who knew how to
delegate, had the passion to inspire, and looked good in what he wore to work.
He never professed to have skills greater than his subordinates. He acknowledged
that they knew what they were doing in their domains. But he established the vision
the tone. He was in charge of morale.............

Now thinking about these requirements for our next president it makes the choice very clear. I don't know how anybody could be inspired by McCain. He's dull, blubbering and rather old. The life he led has been one of privilege. And in my opinion, his service record isn't all he says it is (that might be the subject of another blog later). Obama on the other hand can turn you to tears with his speeches. He makes you want to open you wallet to get him elected. He will surround himself with competent people and allow them to do their job. He is somebody we can be proud the be represented by.

Abortion

2008-08-22T09:29:00.000-07:00

During last Saturdays Presidential candidates discussion the subject of abortion rights came. It was clear after both candidates answered the question who had the best answer. Mcbush gave a quick answer that only acknowledged one side of the question. Obama on the other hand gave a thoughtful intelligent answer that acknowledged the fact fact that the question is a very complicate one with many correct answers. He basically said he doesn't like abortion but that he would not end legal abortion because harm it would do to mothers. This has been a view he's held since his second year at Harvard law school according to an article published in Politico.

Obama takes a very reasonable approach. Nobody, unless you're really cold, wants to have an abortion. but ending legal abortion wouldn't end abortion. Instead of being open it would go back into the back alley's were not only would we loose the baby's anyway but probably the mothers as well. Obama suggest the way to cut down on abortion is through education and giving the potential mothers options that they don't have today. Who can really argue with that.

The Elitist

2008-08-21T13:17:00.000-07:00

I Started to wonder who is the real elitist as the candidate for president. Obama grew up with a single mother and was raised by his grandparents. He lived a very normal life in Hawaii. When he went to collage it was on his personal strength and he had to pay for his own education. He took a job starting at the lowest level. He spent a lot of time working his way to the top.

Mcbush was born of a rich family and was sent to school on the government. he grew up in a privileged society. Today he is worth over $100 million. he believes that middle class is up to 3 million dollars. We've already had eight years of a spoiled child as president and look what he has done to us.

The question is Can we afford 4 more?

So the choice is clear

2008-08-17T13:55:00.000-07:00

After the televised discussion yesterday the choice seems even more clear than it was before. Mcbush spent the time talking much about war and how he would listen to the generals when it came to policy. I always thought that it was the generals job to listen to the president. When asked to name the worse supreme court justices he named the best of the supreme court and touted the worse. He was asked to tell his interpretation for what it was to be rich. He gave 5 million dollars as a rich level. He answered most of the questions with simple answers no matter how complex the issue was. He spent his time pandering to the audience and spent his time telling jokes rather than really discussing important issues. He used an old and tired method of inserting stories to illustrate points and most of the time the stories had nothing to do with the point he was making.

It becomes clear after watching both these candidates that the better choice for president is Obama. He was thoughtful and intelligent in his answers. He demonstrated that he knew both sides of each issue and gave proper respect to those he disagreed. He spoke in a manner that would make me proud as an American to be represented by this man. yes the choice is clear.

Level Taxes

2008-08-04T15:55:00.000-07:00

Recently the idea of a level tax rate has become popular. Many people feel that its the only way to fairly tax the population. I have to admit for a long time I felt the same way. I was able to argue the logic and necessity of such a taxing system. I decided to find another country that uses this system and find out how it works in that country to be able to use as an example of the superiority of a single rate system.

Interestingly though, no matter how much I looked I couldn't find such a country. So I began to try and figure out why of all the other countries none had adopted this system that seemed so logical. As I looked into it the logic of our progressive tax became much more understandable. It can be understood by asking and answering two simple questions. 1) Should those that use the most government services pay the most in taxes. 2) Is it fair to treat everybody exactly alike?

Should Those that use the most services pay the most in taxes?

If you think the answer to this question is no! There is no need to go on the flat tax is for you. The plain fact is that the rich use the majority of our government services. They drive the most cars: They use the airports the most: They demand the attention of the police (an example is the 25000 dollars spent in B. Spears to take her to the court): I'm sure not many public marinas are fashioned for the poor: Public Schools in rich areas are always much better than public school in poor areas: Roads are maintained to higher degree in the upper level areas than the lower levels: I could go on forever but I won't bore you with a gigantic list of things that the government provides for the rich that they don't provide for the poor. The truth is that the rich receive many more government services than do the poor so logic only dictates that the rich should pay much more for the services they receive.

Is it fair to treat everybody exactly alike?

The answer to this is emphatically no! especially in this country where we have such a diverse population: The young have different needs than the old. Farmers have different needs than city folk and Urban areas have different needs than the Suburbs. Business has a whole set of needs that the private citizen doesn't even think of. All these different needs need different funding.

So in conclusion, people of higher means receive more service and can afford to support our society so they should pay a higher percentage of their income toward it. I know from personal observation that ten dollars means a lot more to many of my friends than it does to me. So if you are in the part of society that pays higher taxes be thankful that you are, because you get more of the blessings this country offers.

Race in the Race

2008-08-03T22:00:00.000-07:00

The other day I heard John McCain accuse Obama of inserting race in the race for president. I had to laugh when I heard that. Race has been in political race from the beginning. When he was running against Hilary. It was Bill that was publicly saying those little subtle things. This was going on while the republicans were sending out one racist email after another. You all probably received the "Our First Family" email. Who was the first public figure to start emphasizing Obama's middle name. How many emails have any of you received that states for a fact that Obama is a secret Muslim. No its not the Obama camp inserted race into this Presidential race. Its the same people that called Carrie a coward to the benefit of the two most cowardly people that ever held office.

Why We Need Medical Reform

2008-07-17T16:33:00.000-07:00

I just got the first bill from the illness I'm going through. It was shocking. I was a 25 minute CT test. The Hospital charged over $14,000 for this test. I am lucky! I have health insurance that will pay the bill. But they will not pay the $14,000 that the hospital charged they will pay a little over $600. Now I got to thinking that what would have happened if I didn't have insurance, I could not have been treated. We have well over 40 million Americans that can not for some reason have health insurance. Lets all hope that they don't get sick.

This is something that we as a country have to do something about. I look around at the political landscape and between the two major candidates running I think we only have one choice and that is Obama. McBush will make sure that the health segment of our country will stay as it is leaving out a great segment of our country.

Papa

The Trouble With Military Men

2008-07-14T22:14:00.000-07:00

I just finished watching the classic film "The Day The Earth Stood Still." It got me thinking about this election. In the film, a space ship lands in Washington DC and a spaceman comes out of the ship. In the meantime the military surrounds the ship and puts all of its weapons at the ready. The space say "I come in peace" and starts walking toward the leaders of the military men. On his walk toward the men he reaches into his vest and pulls out an object. Before he can explain what the object is, he is shot by one of the soldiers. As the spaceman is laying on the ground, he explains that the object was a gift that would allow the leaders of Earth to communicate with civilized planets in the universe. Of course now the gift is destroyed and the earth is in danger of being destroyed. I will not bother retelling the rest of the story, this is sufficient to remind me further why a MILITARY MIND will not be an advantage to our country and another reason why electing John McBush president.

We've already had eight years of a military presidency (even though this president never really served in the military). What has it gotten us? A destroyed economy; the lowest standing in the world since WWII; we are much less secure than we were before 911; Our treasury has been emptied; we are in dept to the same people who have vowed to destroy us. Some how we have to get out of this quagmire of fighting first and not talking to the people that don't agree with us. Truthfully that's all that McBush offers us. Please don't forget the "bomb bomb bomb Iran, and Maybe stay there 100 years." What we are doing is not working lets try something different.

Papa

So We're Just having Illusions

2008-07-10T18:04:00.000-07:00

Yesterday the Mcbush campaign told us that the recession we're now in is just mental. It wasn't too long ago that the Mcbush campaign tendered an energy plan. McCain said that drilling would be psychological on the wold market. This was even though it wouldn't do one thing toward lowering gas prices (it would help their rich oil friends get richer). I would think that the reason that they really don't believe that the economy is suffering is because the only people to benefit from the Bush years has been the upper class elite. And guess who is in the upper class.

Well Mcbush...... you don't get it. This is not just our imagination. We are hurting! the price of fuel is too high. Food is too expensive. You might be having trouble truing to figure out how to pay for your children's fancy private collage education, but we're having troubles figuring out how we might pay for food for our family. We're having trouble trying to provide electricity for our family to light our houses. Speaking of houses we're even having trouble keeping our families in one because your rich buddies ran up the prices of housing.

NO!!!!!!!!! this isn't mental ....... Its real

Papa

The new Threat

2008-07-09T22:15:00.000-07:00

So Iran tested some missiles today and it didn't take long for the wing nuts to get on the talking heads and try and scares us into voting for McBush in this next election. We were scared into keeping one of the worst presidents in the history of our country. I hope you remember the last election when they upped the terror alert every time the poles started to favor John Carry. This election I guess the threat will be the boogieman Iran. So it starting to become clear if you want endless war and tons of money wasted on killing you should vote for the republican.

Whats Wrong with Flip Flops?

2008-07-09T00:15:00.000-07:00

I've heard so much about Flip Flops in Politics at this early date in the election season that I started thinking about what this meant. I know that this was a very cute thing to say about John Carry and really nobody ever thought to think about the implications of this cute saying. We've suffered through almost eight years of a president that wouldn't adjust his thinking for anything. He stubbornly stuck to his guns while so many American were being killed for really no reason. He has been philosophically single minded. He has refused to bend and find different solutions for problems that have come up. He also has tended to bend the facts to fit his philosophy.

I've decided that a president that Flip Flops and changes when a new set of facts come into play isn't a bad idea. Senator Obama if you have flip flopped because you have been presented with a new set of facts, I salute you